Anti-immigration policies introduced by the second Trump Administration inadvertently undermine calls to for workers to return to the office by limiting the workforce and making it harder to employ H-1B visa holders.
People might ask how one action affects another or how two issues are related, but we live in a connected world, and these situations create ripples that impact others in ways we might not realize. A perfect example is the current political atmosphere regarding immigration in the U.S. and how it indirectly impacts remote work, forcing corporate America to consider digital borders.
As we move further away from the height of the pandemic, more legacy companies are demanding an immediate and complete return to the office (RTO). These organizations often claim that productivity suffers and communication breaks down when employees are offered the heightened flexibility that comes with remote work, despite supporting evidence that remote work reduces costs and remote employees are equally productive as office workers. Mainly, return-to-office mandates symbolize a demand to return to a status quo that benefits the few over the many.
At the same time, President Trump's second administration, including the Department of Defense and Homeland Security, has taken a stark anti-immigrant stance. Under orders from this administration, intense U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids have occurred across the country, even involving an unprecedented deployment of the Marines and National Guard to American cities. These raids have sparked nationwide protests, with the No Kings Protest being one of the largest in American history.
Together, these two issues disrupt the American workforce by restricting the flow of talent that fuels the economy.
The debate about return-to-office mandates continues, with an increasing number of people preferring remote or hybrid work arrangements. Remote and hybrid work arrangements offer increased flexibility and diversity in the workplace. Employees can achieve a better work-life balance, for example, by working from home while caring for their children or in a job that they otherwise couldn't commute to. Employers, on the other hand, have access to a pool of global talent. Regardless of your stance on working from home, RTO mandates inherently shrink the workforce, limiting workers and talent to those who can realistically make the commute.
Additionally, these anti-immigration policies create more problems than they theoretically solve, with indiscriminate deportations, infringing upon the rights to due process, and the back and forth on attempting to remove H1-B visa recipients from American colleges.
According to the National Foundation for American Policy, approximately 20% of H-1 B visa applications are approved, making it the most competitive and restrictive American visa. Those who receive this visa are students or working professionals, educated talent at the top of their fields, often in S.T.E.M. or other related disciplines.
U.S. companies benefit significantly from employing H-1B visa holders, who are required to have specialty occupations related to their field of study and sponsorship from their employers. U.S. companies are guaranteed the service of a talented employee for three to six years (the duration of the visa, during which the visa holder can apply for a green card). However, with the rise in anti-immigration policies, working to enforce ever stricter rules and enforcements on the H-1B program as a means of "Buying and Hiring American."
The only problem is that Americans currently face an uphill battle, with little to no governmental support, to earn the specialized degrees that would help them replace H-1 B workers.
All of this results in U.S. companies, who are looking for top talent, outsourcing their roles remotely.
If you were to ask Google or Microsoft, they would most likely argue that this is a potential win-win situation. They provide jobs and save money by sponsoring an immigrant's citizenship or office space. At the same time, those working remotely outside the U.S. can earn a living and stay close to their families and home cultures. And while those are positive things, for America and the American economy, it's a net loss.
With the invention of the digital nomad visa, other countries are leveraging remote work to generate revenue. They invite remote workers to stay for a while without requiring them to pay for their employment and then profit from the economic benefits of their physical presence.
Remote workers come and spend their time and money fueling their host country's economy.
With the United States polar opposite approach, Corporate America benefits. Still, the overall economy shrinks, missing out on the time, energy, and resources these immigrants reinvest in their host country's economy.
America is a melting pot, plain and simple. Unless you are 100% Indigenous, our families all moved to this country at some point. Despite what some would like to believe, immigrants make significant contributions to the United States, its culture, and its economy, helping to make it great.
With these anti-immigration, pro-isolationist policies, America loses much more than it might realize in the form of "soft power." It is the exposure to American culture that perpetuates the "American dream," especially for H-1B visa holders. They come to the States, live and work, build relationships, and experience Western traditions and values. Even if they return to their home countries after their visas expire, they carry that experience with them. It's the same whenever a traveler comes home after a vacation or journey with a new admiration and understanding of the world. To deny them entry, American culture AND its global reputation suffer.
Washington will have to choose which it wants to prioritize: its anti-immigration stance or its demand for a return-to-office policy, as the evidence suggests it will have a hard time achieving both. Remote is not the enemy, and it is clear that the harder Washington and legacy companies try to push RTOs, the more demand for remote and hybrid work arrangements will increase. Remote teams are also more competitive, and despite calls for isolationism from the President's administration, global workforces are the future.
Remote is also not anti-immigrant, but if we're not careful, then those looking to harm immigration can use it as a tool. There is no reason why we can't both welcome immigrants seeking a new life in the United States and strike a balance between remote and hybrid work systems. You can't be for the digital nomad lifestyle and anti-immigrant.
Follow The Remote Traveler for more travel and remote work news and opinions.